Saturday, May 30, 2015

Recapturing Our Theological Identity: Beyond Lament



After the Lament

I recently lamented about the lack of theological concern among many in church culture.  I did so in such a way that sought to highlight a twofold problem, as I see it, in church life today: 1) lack of theological pursuit, and 2) lack of concern for theology demonstrated by substituting either pragmatism or politics (or both) for the Christ-centered mission of God through the Church (see my previous blog entry).  Below, I want to give four suggestions, which I call “introductory” or “basic” suggestions, simply because they represent only a small part of a more complex and ongoing solution to the theological malaise of denominations like my own.  I suggest these to remind myself and to be self-critical more than I say them to point out flaws in others.  But I do think they are practical ways to continually move us toward a concern for being part of the mission of God in the world in a way that more adequately reflects the revolutionary elements of the Kingdom of God that Jesus came to proclaim, to live out, and to invite us to. 

Four Basic Suggestions

1. Realize we really are a theological institution.
There are many approaches to church life that can help a church grow and be organized.  Models from business, politics, and the social sciences have at times made helpful contributions to the health of many churches.  However, problems have arisen in regard to our theological depth and our long-term sense of mission when these models overtake and outrank our theological vision.  By theological vision, I mean the sense in which we are rooted in the person and work of Jesus Christ as primary, in such a way that all other ways of being take a back seat to His ways.  So, because we are an institution (an organized group of people) centered around God (theos in the Greek), then we are indeed a “theological institution” before we are any other kind of institution.  Our primary concern is to be about God, God’s ways of doing things (even if they are not as “efficient” as other models), God’s definitions (of things like “success”, for instance), and God’s purposes (i.e., What gives God the most influence?).

2. Do not fear mystery.
There is nothing wrong with being helpful and practical.  There are many helpful, practical things that can be learned in Scripture, and many of those things can be transferred into even secular realms of living.  “Do unto others”, for instance, is a good way of doing business, precisely because it is, as Jesus reminds us, a good way (the best way) to live.  However, when everything in the Bible becomes a neat and tidy self-help, how-to session, we miss out on some of the most challenging and life-changing parts of Scripture.  The reason is that in the times when we, like some of His encounters with the disciples and other hearers in the Gospels, leave on Sundays asking, “What was that all about?” (see Mark 6:20 and Luke 9:7, for instance) it forces us to lean heavily on the Spirit of God and on further exploration of Scripture for clarity.  This does not imply that we should be purposely unclear.  It does mean that we should not feel the urge to make everything fit so comfortably in a 30 minute sermon that people only walk away with ways of living at peace in a world that is alien to the Gospel!  People should leave on Sundays consistently challenged with the mystery of how God can call us as Christians to be so radically different from the world, while at the same time seeking to live in the world (see Jesus’ prayer in John 17).  A valid critique of situation comedies (sit-coms) is that they take the most difficult issues and resolve them in 30 minutes with a laugh and a hug at the end.  Life is not that way.  The Gospel is a lifelong pursuit, and so allowing hearers to wrestle with the mysteries of the text and of the faith is part of our growth as Christians.

3. Have an “aggravation shelf.” 
For years now I have had what I call an “aggravation shelf” in my library.  In fact, it I has since grown to several shelves.  Former students and current church members often ask to see it when I mention it in the classroom or in a message.  It is a shelf filled with books that often challenge me to the point of aggravation: writers who wrestle with the same faith issues I wrestle with, but from a different perspective than mine.  These writers are intelligent and most of them are Christians, yet their perspectives differ in some degree from my own.  By reading them, I am challenged in my faith, and I am forced to continually remove God from the box that I try to keep God in.  Reading these authors all the time would probably be too frustrating, but making myself read these authors consistently has changed my life in a very positive way.  In fact, a few have, in my view, “corrected” my theology in such a profound way that it has drawn me closer to this God I thought I knew.  Some do not even stay on my aggravation shelf, but become regular sources of theological exploration and devotional help.  This kind of engagement in the wrestlings of the larger Body of Christ in the world, as well as engagement with leading non-Christian writers of our day, also keeps me out of my box!  In other words, the challenging words and approaches of others force me to seek God, and not just a smaller “version” of God with which I am comfortable.

4. Fully Commit to God’s Ways Above All Else
At first this seems too broad of a statement, but at its heart is a desire to let the ways of God, expressed in His Son Jesus Christ and led by the Holy Spirit working through the history of God’s people become the primary lens through which I view reality.  Consequently, this lens becomes my key to interpreting, teaching, and seeking to represent Jesus and His mission in the world.  Furthermore, this lens replaces other lenses that I as a Christian leader am tempted to use – often by other church leaders! – in approaching the calling and mission of the Church.  I am often tempted to simply parrot the techniques of prominent business leaders, politicians, or media pundits.  When I refuse to let the lenses of Christ filter these approaches, the Church loses its credibility and prophetic voice.  When I engage these lenses as filters, then I am more likely to engage in the true mission and message of Christ, even when fellow-Christians seem dissatisfied.

Being the Church in Contrast to the World 


The call to be the Church in contrast to the world, according to ethicist and theologian Stanley Hauerwas, is the greatest gift the Church can give to the world.  This call is easily forgotten in times of vast media and political influence upon our culture and upon church leaders.  However, Jesus seems more and more determined to do what He originally set out to do: build His Church (Matthew 16:18).  As Jesus does this, those things that are not essential to the mission of Christ will lose their power and influence, and those who refuse to build His Church His way will become more and more disillusioned, as have many church members and leaders whose goals were different from the goals of Christ.  The greatest concern I have as a pastor is that of passing along to my children and to those around me the life-changing, world-challenging, prophetic nature of the Church that many have died to pass along.  That means that God and God’s ways – theology – must again become the primary concern of those of us who seek to lead as “under-shepherds” of the Great Shepherd of the Church.

No comments:

Post a Comment