Thursday, August 21, 2014

The Kingdom of God and Ferguson


The Question That is NOT Being Asked

Many discussions I hear and read about the tragedy in Ferguson, Missouri, either begin or end with this question: “What if a large man came at you in a violent way?  Wouldn’t you shoot him if you were armed?”
Let me ask a question that I don’t hear, at least from those of us in the white community: What if your son (or daughter) were walking down the street, was asked to move over, said that he/she was just going to the next block and would be off the street soon, was suddenly confronted with a backed up police vehicle that nearly hit him/her, and then was asked to come over to the car?  And, what if he/she ran in fear, not recognizing the officer, who was of a different race that is prevalent in his/her neighborhood.  Then, what if that officer shot him/her six times and he/she were unarmed?

Both questions make assumptions about things we as of yet know little about.  Both scenarios – an aggressive young man and the overly aggressive policeman – have been presented by alleged witnesses.  Some say the young man who was shot, Michael Brown, was being aggressive and possibly even going for the weapon of the officer.  Other eyewitness accounts say that he was either fleeing or attempting to flee with his hands up indicating he was unarmed.  Still other reports fall somewhere in between those two extremes. 
Many analysts have indicated that there has been a good deal of slanted reporting.  Some are trying to portray Brown, a recent high school graduate who was about to begin taking college courses and was visiting his grandmother in Ferguson, as a “thug”: another black youth caught up in violence, gangs, and trouble.  Some even say that had he lived, he may have been the suspect in a recent store burglary (shoplifting).  

Still others see the slant going against the police officers of Ferguson: they were too aggressive, too racially charged, acting in fear in certain neighborhoods instead of in line with their training, and were too zealous to assert their “control” over an increasingly African-American population.  This version goes something like this: When the black youth was defiant, the officer responded with deadly force, probably out of fear – not just fear of the youth but of the mostly African-American neighborhood. 

Again, there is probably a little (or a lot) of truth in both of these scenarios.  It is likely that Michael Brown, like most teens regardless of color, may have felt resentful or fearful in being stopped by an officer.  It is also likely that the officer was not exactly feeling safe in the neighborhood and was on edge, possibly prompting what appears to many to be excessive: emptying his gun into an unarmed young man. 

What We Know

We have no way of knowing all of the details, especially in regard to the feelings of the two men at that time.  The officer may never tell, and the dead young man cannot tell us. 

If I could, though, I would like to submit a few things that I think we do know.

1. Racial tension, especially between the public and those who are charged with overseeing the public, must continue to be addressed.  Some say this is playing “the race card.”  However, the truth is: The race card is already in play in many communities like Ferguson!  We must address this honestly and openly.  Those in power must be proactive in reaching out.  Those who feel overwhelmed or outnumbered or discriminated against must find ways to listen and to be heard, using methods that hopefully will not escalate the violence.

2. Officers always need more training.  My father was a police officer for many years, and I have friends and other family members who serve in law enforcement.  The training they receive is ongoing and in the words of many of them, the training never covers every aspect of the job.  That is why it is consistent, ongoing, and necessary.  If one of the results of this terrible tragedy is to make sure that officers are better trained in regard to the use of deadly fire, then it will be a glimmer of light in an otherwise sad story.  Furthermore, if it can assist in helping officers and the people they serve increase dialogue regarding expectations in times of conflict, then some good will come from this terrible tragedy.

3. Violence produces more violence.  Jesus said that those who “live by the sword die by the sword.”  American Christians tend to overlook this important nugget of wisdom from Jesus, because we have become a violent nation.  However, the aggressive exchange between the young man and the police officer escalated.  The violent protesters are not the majority of protesters, but they get the most press, and their violence increases the violence from others, including police.  It is a vicious cycle that desperately needs peacemakers.

4. Politics has become the American religion.  Even many Christians I read and talk with have little regard for approaching this tragedy with the words and wisdom and vision of Jesus.  Rather, they look to what conservative or liberal leaders are saying in the media and they take cues from them. Period.  For Christians, this is a form of idolatry that only hinders the reconciliation process.  It is interesting to me to watch how politicians are reacting to this.  Conservatives are usually for “smaller government”, yet many conservative leaders are endorsing the actions of the police (a government entity) and assuming that the police officer was correct.  Liberals tend to lean more toward pacifism.  Yet, many liberal leaders are using terms like “we will fight,” and “fight fire with fire,” etc.  Again, the loudest voices among these groups do not represent all conservatives or liberals, but their reactions remind us that politicians will seek to rally an audience for their own gain.  God, however, seeks the truth, regardless of the audience. It seems to me that those who purport to follow God must choose God's way over the media pundits and politicians.

5. There are no “winners” in this tragedy.  Again, as the son of a policeman, I want to believe that the officer acted with the best intentions and in the best way.  But, having seen a wide range of officers in my life, I know that like in any profession, there are all kinds of people who wear a badge.  And, even those with the best of intentions can make tragic mistakes.  I am also the father of two sons.  Because of this, my heart breaks for the parents and grandparents of Michael Brown.  All kids, whether they are generally good (as Brown’s friends and family say he was) or generally rebellious, make mistakes in their young lives.  As parents and friends, we pray that the mistakes they make will be ones from which they learn and that their mistakes are not the kind that end in tragedy.  For Michael Brown’s family, six bullets ended further opportunities to influence and teach him.  Both of these families – those of the officer and those of Michael Brown – will be forever changed by that fateful day.  We cannot pray enough for both families involved!

Thy Kingdom Come


When Jesus, in the Lord’s Prayer, prayed, “Thy Kingdom come,” He was talking about God’s new way of doing things: God’s kingdom.  He was making a distinction, as Jesus did throughout His life and ministry, between the “kingdoms of this world” (i.e., how political systems normally operate) and the Kingdom of God (how God chooses to operate in the world through love).  Speaking the truth in love is the normative way of communicating in this new kingdom, according to the Bible (Ephesians 4:15).  That means that those who seek to be a part of God’s way of doing things can bring some hope to Ferguson, Missouri, and to other violence torn places in our world.  We can honestly and lovingly remind them that violence only creates more violence.  We can remind them that hypocrisy only leads to despair and fear.  We can remind them that the things that divide us – like race and economic despair – are real and need to be honestly and lovingly addressed.  We can remind them that it is not alright to safely hide behind banners or race, money, or power.  We can remind them that we all have a responsibility to serve, to listen, and to do our best to be part of the healing of our communities.  Name-calling, stereotyping, and raw violence has never solved anything, and it never will.  May God grant His peace to all of us.

Saturday, August 2, 2014

My Success I Give You: Taking Jesus Seriously


Different Definitions

I am a pastor.  Before that, though, I am a Christian – not just in name (my last name happens to be “Christian”), but in testimony.  This means I have made certain choices about the direction my life will go: my family values, my vocation, and my definitions.  All three of these are important, but the definition change has been the hardest.  Many people have a high view of family – even people with little or no faith background.  Many people make sacrifices in their vocational choices, not just those who have felt a call to vocational ministry as I have for the past 22 years of my life.  

But the part about changing definitions may be the most distinctive aspect of the Christian life when applied to everyday living.  Following Jesus Christ entails a theological venture in which even familiar words take on entirely different meanings than before following Christ.  This is perhaps among the most radical change that occurs when one seeks to follow Christ.  Examples of this kind of calling are found throughout the New Testament, especially in the Gospels.  We find Jesus changing the definition of “peace,” for instance: “My peace I give you; not as the world gives,” Jesus states in John 14:27 (emphasis mine).  Here Jesus is fully aware of the Pax Romana (the “peace of Rome”) that was pervasive in His day:

·         Rome built roads so that business people and soldiers could promote “peace and prosperity.” 
·         They raised the biggest armies to put down any threats to their version of “peace” (which really just meant keeping themselves in control so they would rest easy)
·         They retaliated with “shock and awe” methods – like mass crucifixion, for instance – if any group or village under their domain posed a threat to their “peace”
·         They gave favor and additional freedoms to the “successful” among the conquered peoples in their domain in order to provide a sort of bridge between themselves and the “common people” who, in their minds, would at least rest easy knowing they have some sort of representation to Rome.  Rome would of course rest easy knowing that they had paid insiders to help them “keep the peace.”

This is the kind of peace that Jesus came to oppose and replace!  His earthly life and ministry actually fell victim to this Roman definition of “peace”, and Jesus was crucified.  Thankfully, though, Jesus’ definition of peace proved to be the stronger and more lasting one, which brings us back to the importance of theology.  More specifically, it reminds us that we should probably take a closer look at theological definitions, rather than those promoted among governments and popular culture.  Too often we as Christians settle for lesser – and by lesser I mean those doomed to ultimate failure in God’s eyes – definitions.  In American Christianity, the most disturbing example of this has come in our definition of “success.”

We Change the Definition of “Success”

Speaking as a participant in a Christian denomination (the Church of the Nazarene) as one of its ordained ministers for nearly half of my life and as student of American religious movements, I can say that in many of our American contexts (including my own) the de-emphasis upon theological study has at times seen a reversion to more secular definitions of “success.”  Popular (secular) definitions of “success” include financial prosperity, personal charisma, and amassing a great number of followers and/or employees.  While there is no doubt that it takes talented people to amass such things, as Christians, we are confronted with a decidedly different definition. 

For Jesus, who amassed relatively few followers during his earthly ministry, faithfulness, integrity, honesty, humility, and even suffering for what is right (see the Sermon on the Mount) are things that are identified with “success.”  In the example of Scripture, sometimes these qualities result in financial prosperity and even amassing great numbers.  Sometimes, however, they do not!  Indeed, sometimes Jesus is most critical of big money, big charisma, and big numbers in and of themselves (see Jesus’ encounter with the rich young ruler or with those who are selling in the outer court of the Temple in Jerusalem!).  When a theological examination – a Christ-centered one – is missing from words like “success”, the default option becomes to simply measure success the way everyone else does.  Unfortunately, “everyone else’s” definition falls short of the longer lasting and more ethical definition of Jesus.

The results in church settings in America have been devastating at times.  People who meet secular standards of “success” have gained more influence in leadership, and shortcuts are taken.  These shortcuts conveniently avoid key elements of the teachings and example of Christ and substitute these for methods that fall short of God’s ideals for His people.  

Consequently, sermons become self-help tools or emotionally charged reflections on the “good old days” instead of prophetic challenges to live out the Gospel of Christ.  Churches become tools for the promotion of political agendas (and candidates!), rather than vehicles of the voice of God to all aspects of those in political power.  Church leaders become more interested in hearing from the latest business guru instead of digging deeper into the rich theological depths of the Bible and of the history of the people of God.  We pastors begin buying books on being better CEOs instead of books on being better at discerning the mind of Christ.  We begin going to conferences on “breaking the 200 (or 1000!) barrier” instead of conferences that help us become better intercessors and incarnational ministers of the good news of Jesus.  We appoint and elect leaders who will look and sound more like the CEO of Microsoft or Apple, so that we can appear relevant and vibrant, instead of selecting leaders who will speak the truth in love, regardless of the short term cost. 

The Rabbi in the Back of the Class

Recently I read an excerpt of a book by a professor who is also an ordained minister.  He said that in his teaching, preaching, and writing, he always imagines an orthodox Jewish rabbi in the back of the room either nodding or frowning.  In his mind, this professor envisions this image of the rabbi as how Jesus himself may have looked, and he says that he carries this image with him to remind him that ultimately the goal is for the rabbi in the back of the room to be nodding in approval, even if the others in the crowd are scowling.  Perhaps we need to carry around a picture of Jesus to place in our conferences, our meetings, our classrooms, and our places of worship.  Perhaps seeing Him smile and nod in approval will provoke some major changes in personnel and in approach for most of our denominations, Christian organizations, and churches.  Just as Jesus replaced the “peace of Rome” with a more lasting and fulfilling peace.  Perhaps we can listen for Jesus saying, “Though I know you are familiar with the ‘success of America,’ and you have functioned under that definition for a long time, MY success I give to you, NOT as the world has given….”